Opinion


揾食派與苦肉計

posted 11 Oct 2017, 08:04 by Hong Kong Independence Party

這是一件好事,亦不會客觀地令《聯合聲明》如以下奶支報紙自吹會失效:乜大部分在地居民有出嚟反抬證明《聯合聲明》失效?
吹奏呢啲芝麻綠豆之事的人只是苦肉計,博攤大手板,繼續消費香港人;一個英國MP被拒進入香港,早喺2014年1X個MP已經被拒,呢個算得係乜?
仲有大部份在地居民根本冇為此事出嚟,施行此約一方根本毫無反應,相反繼續炒股炒樓,"生活方式不變",此約何時死咗?
都唔洗諗,下次《半年報告》一樣會寫"一支兩制運作良好"。成件事好民主:冇人出嚟,咪so far so good,有乜唔啱?
想改變現狀,首先就要自己製造災難,繼而反枱,另起爐灶;而不是借芝麻綠豆之事去吹奏,博攤大手板,以為咁可以向民主大乞衣施壓,跪求:佢明係乞衣,你點跪點求,佢係咪乜都冇;反而跪跪下佢一拳打落你度,令你頭破血流。

蒙羞?咪阻住港豬炒股炒樓吧!

http://hkm.appledaily.com/detail.php?guid=57318427&category_guid=6996647&category=instant&issue=20171011

給英國海外公民燈神黃世澤一堂支那語文課

posted 1 Oct 2017, 12:45 by Hong Kong Independence Party

基於此人對支那情況極不熟悉,又要自吹自擂,又要奶支誤導香港人。本黨以最簡單的看圖識字方式,教他一課支那語文課,residence card的支那文字正解。學完後本黨相信係佢腦袋中只有合法入境同非法入境者,legal immigrant and illegal immigrant.

英國海外公民燈神黃世澤為何不做光榮的支那人?

posted 1 Oct 2017, 03:29 by Hong Kong Independence Party   [ updated 1 Oct 2017, 15:06 ]

呢啲叫做死性不改。啱聽叫花生,唔啱聽叫鬼神,倒頭只係浪費所餘無幾的時間,累死無辜的下一代(當然,你要做光榮的支那人,這是另計。)
身份證,從來係違反人權的物體。可惜燈神甚至一班港豬卻自己攬哂上身,甘心為奴。
燈神身為英國公民,竟然連如此常識,甚至本國對抗身份證的歷史,以及本國用甚麼證件作為ID,竟然一無所知。又或者可能為了自己寫字業務扮不願面對。
分化?唔洗。無知便是無敵,全程自動波:望下張咭,背面不是寫明你有"居留權"?稍有少少常識都知道這是一張居住證, residence card.身份證?你繼續樂意為奴,咪繼續揹住一世。奴隸值得浪費時間去分化?
其實你叫居住證,居留咭也罷。本黨仝人係帶護照出街,一係UK Driving licence ,有咭係Citizen card。身份證?你自欺欺人,咪用埋本黨的份。反正好快帶身份證會target為恐怖分子,境都出唔到。到時叫英國公民燈神救你?
乜嘢叫獨立?最基本就係完全否定,無視敵人政權及其一切。連基本之事也不做,反而樂於接受其俾你奴隸身份加一組奴隸號碼,便不應狂妄自大,自視過高,外力就可以分化你。話本黨冇做嘢,叫你衝果啲更好笑:不需睇你面色的M P見到你咁,仲有甚麼資格要求人哋義務呢樣果樣?難聽啲講,你自己都無料到,又憑乜要外人白白為你犧牲?相反,你做奴隸,又不反枱,正正不是生活不錯?依照路線圖,《聯合聲明》正正不是非常有效地實行?它不是保證你不會自然地變成敘利亞?當然,你自己反枱,向世界展示你不惜一切立國的決心,國際才可能另眼相看。
如大公廁,支球時報一樣,本黨不會以德報怨,多謝英國公民燈神黃世澤自己劈炮奶支報紙寫手兼打手業務能抽空以及一眾膠登港奴大力宣傳。
都係果句:你自己仲FF今日仲係英治時代,this is your business.你手上的,的確只係一張居住證,仲可以累到你被恐怖份子送入監倉居住。
https://m.hkgalden.com/view/445211

交戰守則

posted 19 Apr 2017, 02:15 by Hong Kong Independence Party

前言:

從古到今 雞蛋同高牆經常都會發生碰撞 雞蛋看似脆弱 但係都有戰勝既時候 近年香港既玩家積累左好多exp 打怪既能力同意識節節提升 好多幾年前無人夠膽做既行為 今日已經成為香港歷史不可磨滅既一部份 但似乎無人肯系統化咁將呢D累計幾十萬小時既寶貴經驗做一個有系統既整理分析 只係以幾句"強身健體迎接未來挑戰"概況 係非常可惜既一件事 他日再度打怪既時候 擁有系統化既知識同訓練會令相關工作事半功倍 因此小弟在此略盡棉力 令廣大有志之士能夠好好準備 早日升呢.

呢幾篇文章係小弟由雨革開始 喺空餘時間研究本地同中外既抗爭事件之中使用既戰術同裝備 再抽出其中能夠應用喺本地既內容 本手冊既第二章會簡述有關行動安全既指引 第三章會介紹資訊蒐集既技巧 令玩家玩得放心之餘 長玩長有 始終呢個遊戲係無重生機制 一比人捉到甚至格殺就game over.


華安 20174

Letter to FCO, MoD

posted 11 Mar 2016, 00:47 by Hong Kong Independence Party   [ updated 19 Apr 2017, 02:16 ]


About the "Internet Article 23"

posted 16 Jan 2016, 13:13 by Hong Kong Independence Party

Copyright ( Amendment ) Bill 2014 ( Internet Article 23 )

 

Copyright ( Amendment ) Bill 2014 is used for updating the copyright system of Hong Kong to confirm the development of technology and overseas, keep closer with international trends. For examples, European Union, Australia, Britain, Singapore, New Zealand and Canada. However, in this bill, it is not following international trends. Let us talk about the content of Copyright ( Amendment ) Bill 2014.

 

First, the bill set out there are only copyright owners have the right to disseminate their works. It means non-copyright owners disseminate the works from others will have a chance to afford criminal responsibility. If a citizen download a movie without authorization by the copyright owners and upload to YouTube, it is a piracy. The copyright owners and staff of law enforcement will have the right to charge that citizen. Moreover, the bill set out that copying the essence part of the works is already a piracy but the definition of essence part is very vague. Second creation of joking types, citizen have a second creation by using the original of copyright, is it a piracy? Exemptions point out citizens have to quote the sources, but it doesn’t set an index or quantity of quoting sources. Even quoted the related sources, the staff of law enforcement still can charge the citizens by harming the interests of copyright owners. Furthermore, the bill set out there are six exemptions of parody, satire, pastiche, caricature, quotation and reporting or commenting on current events, how about have a cover of other singers seriously? Is it a piracy? Political second creation is it reporting or commenting on current events? The exemptions of the bill is unclear and narrow in range. It cannot protect the rights of netizens.

 

Therefore, Copyright ( Amendment ) Bill 2014 should include UGC User Generated and Fair Use from US and Canada to balance and protect the rights of netizens and copyright owners. As second creation is a due freedom and right of citizens, any second creations can meet the requirement of non-profit creation, not affecting the market and the interests of the original work, no excessive use of the original work, and lists the contents of the original work references, it should be exempted. Otherwise, the bill will become a tool of rulers to harm the freedom of speech and freedom of internet. When the freedom of speech of the citizens is controlled, Hong Kong will become a place for the dictator to abuse the power.

An open letter to the UK GOV

posted 19 Sep 2015, 13:59 by Hong Kong Independence Party   [ updated 19 Sep 2015, 14:01 ]

12th September, 2015

Hong Kong Independence Party

4th Floor

86-90 Paul Street

London EC2A 4NE

www.hkip.org.uk

An open letter to our Government

As many refugees are coming to Europe, we are going to explain what is the future if UK accept those 

refugees, using Hong Kong for comparison.

First, UK may accept 20,000 refugees in five years. This will give an signature to those refugees, whom deciding where to go, UK is a good choice to be the terminal to settle. It is probably that more than 20,000 refugees will come here, hope before 20,00 quota, within 1 year.

Comparing to Hong Kong, 150 refugees from China everyday accepted by HKSAR, which is colonise government setup and control by China government, cannot reject their entrance. Now accumulated about 760K Chinese colonist invaded Hong Kong.

We are pleased that U.K seems stop huge amount of refugees, by immigration stage. But please 

remember, about 3 million of British National, are suffered by colonists, in the name of Immigrants or refugees. 

HKSAR treat British Nationals in Hong Kong, or named as Hong-Kongers, as American Indian, 

Chinese are eliminating Hong-Kongers’ culture, language, even though their living place. Chinese can enjoy all warfare that Hong-Kongers should have, in prior of Hong-Kongers.

Hong Kong had been handed-over to China without consider Hong-Kongers’  will. In other words, Hong-Kongers are treated as slave hand-over from U.K to China. And now, after umbrella revolution, HKSAR treat Hong-Kongers as refugees while Chinese is citizen. Nowadays, China, Russia and ISIS are, as same as Nazi Germany did to Jewish. China tries to kill Hong-Kongers at the start of umbrella revolution, and killed Tibet people and East 
Turkestan people.Russia killed Ukrainians and invaded East Ukraine and Crimean.

ISIS, seems they want to kill all other human whom differ from them.

Now, it is decade of chaos, we never meet this kind of chaos after World War II. It is time to re-
organise our country, our people (include all British), to pass through this challenge. As the God will not give us challenge which we cannot pass through, this time, we will pass through it same as before. God bless us.

Hong Kong Independence Party

A registered UK political party

Hong Kong Remembrance Day

posted 27 Aug 2015, 15:03 by Hong Kong Independence Party

Hong Kong Remembrance Day, is an important milestone of Hong Kong. It is to remember the reinstatement of freedom resulted from England’s reclaim of Hong Kong’s governance after the Second World War in 30 August 1945. But what is the process of forming a Hong Kong Remembrance Day? Let’s talk about it.
 
In 1937, a war started between China and Japan. A lot of cities in China, such as Nanking, Shanghai, and Canton, were attacked by Japan. Hong Kong, however, didn't get any attacks. At that time Hong Kong was a colony of the United Kingdom (UK), so Hong Kong was not included in the belligerents. Until 1941, the Pacific War started. Pearl Harbor was attacked, Japan declared a war to UK, USA and other Western countries.
 
At the same time, army of Japan started to attack Hong Kong. Battle of Hong Kong Protection started. In the beginning, the British Forces in Hong Kong fought against the army of Japan, then about 2000 Canada soldiers to reinforce. Later, 500 students from Hong Kong University and Hongkongers from different ethnic groups, included European descent, Indian descent and Chinese descent, established Hong Kong Garrison. In the war, most of the gloriously sacrificed soldiers were from UK and Canada, not Chinese Communist Party. Although the Hong Kong army was defeated finally, it was, after all, a battle leaded by Hongkongers.
 
In 1945, Japan surrendered. UK assigned Harcourt to lead the navy and go to Hong Kong. In 30 August 1945, England received the formal letter of surrender from Japan, England ruled Hong Kong again, and set the 30th August to be Hong Kong Remembrance Day, starting from 1946. However, since 1 July 1997, the sovereignty of Hong Kong was transferred to Chinese Communist Party, Hong Kong Remembrance Day was cancelled, youngers don't know what and how important it is.
 
Now, Hong Kong does not only lose our Hong Kong Remembrance Day, but also forced by Chinese Communist Party to celebrate Victory Over Japan Day in the 3rd September. Actually, Victory Over Japan Day is unrelated to Chinese Communist Party, let alone Hong Kong. It is because the People's Liberation Army was not formed at that time. The army was mostly consisted of Nationalist Revolutionary Army, only some were Communist Red Army. So the success of fight is not belong to Chinese Communist Party.
 
 
 
On the other hand, the beginning and ending time between China’s anti-Japan war and battle of Hong Kong Protection were different. China’s anti-Japan was obviously started from war between China and Japan, while the battle of Hong Kong Protection was started from the Pacific War between Japan and Western countries. Moreover, the belligerents of the two wars were different. The object of Japan to attack in China’s anti-Japan war was China, while the object of Japan to attack in Pacific War was UK. Therefore, the history of Japanese colonial period in Hong Kong shouldn’t be put into Chinese history, and we shouldn't follow China to praise for Hong Kong Independent Battalion of the Dongjiang Column.
 
We should remember the sacrificed Hong Kong Garrison soldiers and say thanks to them. Hong Kong Pro-Beijing government’s cancellation of Hong Kong Remembrance Day and establishment of Victory Over Japan Day as public holiday show that, in order to clear the colonial awareness of Hongkongers, Hong Kong Pro-Beijing government will distort the reality of history in Hong Kong.

The reality of the education system in Hong Kong.

posted 20 Jun 2015, 15:27 by Hong Kong Independence Party   [ updated 20 Jun 2015, 15:32 ]

The result of the Primary One Admission has been announced recently. Many Hong Kong mothers who are from the North District such as Sheung Shui, the closest district near the Control Point, cried for the results that their kids cannot study in the original neighborhood. On the other hand, many Mainland mothers are satisfied with the results which their kids can study in the school near the Control Point. Is it fair to the local kids? It is not, without a shadow of a doubt.

Cross-boundary students means those who are born and study in Hong Kong but live in mainland China and both of their parents are not Hongkonger usually. There are 2700 cross-boundary students registered for the Primary One Admission, neglected those registered with a Hong Kong address. Most of them want to study in the North district as it is closer to the Control Point. However, the quota of the primary one are limited and they are originally for those living there. There are no excess quota for the cross-boundary students. They are now occupying the quota, where should the local students study? It is unreasonable to ask the Hong Kong students to study in other district. Hong Kong government should put Hong Kong children in the first priority that to ensure the local school study in the original district first. The cross-boundary students should be put in the second priority that they can only complete the among the remaining quota.

-Kay

1-10 of 12